Getting a conversation going has been a major challenge for this site. We’ve put a lot of energy into that effort, but that just doesn’t seem to be the right direction for this topic in this community.

So for the rest of the summer, we’re taking a different tack. We’ll be working with some local videobloggers to allow community members’ voices to be heard via video interviews.

I’ll be meeting with those videobloggers next week after I return from a business trip, and we should be up and running soon.

Who would you like to see interviewed here? Please comment below or e-mail me.

This week the Boulder-based marketing communications firm Sterling Rice Group announced that it’s offsetting 100% of its electricity use by purchasing renewable energy credits (RECs) from Renewable Choice Energy, also based in Boulder.

RECs are a popular way for people and organizations to shrink their carbon footprint. One reason why RECs (and a similar kind of offering, carbon offsets, which help fund other kinds of projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions) are popular is that all the buyer has to do is write a check. That’s certainly much easier and faster than trying to make your home or building more energy efficient, or rearranging your life so you can drive less. And if these programs are properly audited (for instance, Green-E certifies the RECs sold by Renewable Energy Choice), chances are good that buyers’ dollars are yielding measurable greenhouse gas reductions.

Still, some people question whether buying RECs and carbon offsets are the best use of the money people want to spend to help mitigate climate change.

Here are some issues commonly raised by critics of RECs and carbon offsets…
Read the rest of this entry »